Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties among spouse character characteristic similarity, matchmaking start, relationship quality, and you can love. [ Hyperlinks ]

Baxter, L. An excellent., & Western, L. (2003). Pair perceptions of their similarities and differences: Good dialectical direction. Diary off Personal and you may Public Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]

Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you may feelings. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible dating (pp. 143-161). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Berscheid, Age., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Bodily elegance and matchmaking solutions: An examination of one’s matching theory. Log out of Experimental Public Therapy, eight, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]

Log out of Societal and personal Relationship, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). The latest therapy from social relationships. Top Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hall). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity abilities and you may attributional interaction once the determinants regarding social destination. Address Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you can intimate matchmaking. In the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), The latest guide from public psychology (Vol. dos, next ed. Pp. 193-281). New york: McGraw-Mountain. [ Website links ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Could possibly get 11). U.S. Patent 6,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Links ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Nov. 18). You.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Backlinks ]

Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital variety to own identification dispositions: Assessment that have around three different analysis offer. Behavior Family genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Links ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude from negative and positive reinforcements due to the fact a determinant of interest. Record away from Character and Social Psychology, 2, 884-889. [ Links ]

Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), To have progressive-go out Cupids, investigation substitute relationships: Mental research are trailing the new effective fits made from the eHarmony. Association to own Psychological Science Observer, 18. Downloaded out-of [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Enhancing companion selection over the internet: An evaluation away from matchmaking top quality between marriages as a result of an internet relationship program and you will marriages as a result of unfettered choice. Interpersona: A major international Journal towards Personal Relationship, step 3, 105-125. [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S., & Accumulated snow, C. (2004, May). Permitting single men and women enter best marriages having fun with predictive different types of marital victory. Paper demonstrated at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Western Emotional Neighborhood. [ Website links ]

Means and you may system to have pinpointing individuals who are gonna possess a fruitful relationship

C). How come character count into the ination out of characteristic nervousness, negativity, and you can marital satisfaction. Journal out-of Identity and you can Social Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Website links ]

Clark, M. S. (1985). Ramifications off relationships type to have wisdom compatibility. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in matchmaking aspiration and pleasure that have computer system-install partners. Record off ily, 28, 62-66. [ Website links ]

Cooper, Good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the net: Skills on line attraction. Record out-of https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/chattrum-med-singlar/ Sex Training and you can Procedures, twenty-two, 7-14. [ Links ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Carry out individuals understand what needed: An equivalent otherwise complementary companion? Evolutionary Psychology, six, 595-602. [ Hyperlinks ]

Feingold, A good. (1988). Coordinating getting appeal in the close partners and exact same-sex members of the family: A meta-study and theoretic critique. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Website links ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from popular with terrible: Disenchantment which have an intimate lover. Sociological Views, 44, 263-280. [ Website links ]