The correlational study is aimed at validating the Authenticity Scale in Russian culture. Authenticity is considered a trait responsible for a person’s ability to be oneself. It helps people resist environment pressure and prevent self-alienation, which contributes to maintaining psychological wellbeing. The original Authenticity Scale includes three subscales: Authentic Living, Accepting External Influence, and Self-Alienation. In total, 2,188 respondents (M_age = , SD_age = ; 78.1% female) participated in the survey. The dimensionality of the Authenticity Scale and its measurement invariance across sex, age, and depression rate subgroups was examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; the original tripartite structure was kept. Convergent validity was tested through correlation analyses with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form, the Centre of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. According to the CFA results, the structure of the Russian version differs from the original one slightly (item 1 was moved from the subscale Authentic Living to the subscale Accepting External Influence and item 4 was excluded); however, the modified factor model showed the best absolute and comparative fit statistics [CFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.050 (90% CI [0.40; 0.60]) and SRMR = 0.037]. The reliability (McDonald’s Omega) of the Authenticity Scale subscales was satisfactory and ranged from 0.78 to 0.84. It was revealed that youth are more likely to have high scores on Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation than adults. Men and women did not significantly differ on the sub-scores of Authenticity Scale. Multigroup CFA also showed that Authenticity Scale scores may be biased in people with high levels of clinical depression, in terms of the item intercepts. Authentic Living is positively connected with mental wellbeing, self-esteem, positive affect, satisfaction with life, and negatively with depressive symptoms and negative affect; reverse trends were found for Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation subscales. The Russian version of the Authenticity Scale is a valid, reliable tool that may be recommended for use in various areas of non-clinical practice.

Addition

Private credibility the most necessary viewpoints in the modern hectic and you will altering people where individuals alter the social, financial, and you can educational condition and even identities a few times in their lives. Becoming authentic, to-be oneself – this type of intentions and you may wishes are very important to your emotional well being in one another eudemonic and you can hedonic meanings (Kernis and Goldman, 2006; Smallenbroek et al., 2017; Sutton, 2020).

The Credibility Scale: Recognition from inside the Russian People

Private credibility contributes to different useful mental phenomena, like positive affective dating, personal really-are, highest thinking-admiration, mercy and you may self-compassion, and you will emotional control (Sheldon mais aussi al., 1997; Neff and you may Suizzo, 2006; Theran, 2010; Boucher, 2011; English and John, 2013; Kifer ainsi que al., 2013; Wickham, 2013; Bochaver mais aussi al., 2019; Zhang ainsi que al., 2019; Yanchenko and you can Nartova-Bochaver, 2020). At exactly the same time, it frens en gГјzel kadД±nlara sahip is a boundary ranging from stress and its own consequences or an effective negative predictor away from mental susceptability (Goldman and you may Kernis, 2002; Satici ainsi que al., 2013). Ergo, this can be a quality that is value examining, measuring, and you may developing.

Within the extremely standard mode, authenticity can be defined as someone’s capability to become real so you can on their own, its characteristics, and their existence trajectory. It appears to-be among “troubling” tricky basics, however, because can be acquired separately regarding any goal conditions and you may suggests an effective higher coherence with a particular person’s feelings or information that will be not at all times direct (Jones, 2010). This feature away from authenticity makes it hard to study the message validity of your own relevant systems, and you may, thus, extremely validation research is limited by the fresh investigating divergent authenticity simply. More over, skills authenticity differs round the countries, as well as get across-cultural studies, a steady and you can legitimate device trapping the new center posts out of authenticity will become necessary.