Our data had three big aims: (1) to look at adolescents’ different choices for news data and you may superstars to have parasocial focus, (2) to understand more about the fresh new prevalence and construal from PSR when you look at the an adolescent sample, and you will (3) to determine whether or not gender distinctions came up in the teenage parasocial techniques. With respect to adolescents’ choices of news numbers and you may stars, we hypothesized one to highly salient superstars, including actors and painters, will be appear to said, which have straight down costs out of affirmation getting non-aesthetic stars or deceased mass media numbers. I as well as asked correspondence between brand of star chose and also the attributes teenagers on the them, because highly obvious superstars could well be in the physical appearance, whereas players and you can non-artisans was appreciated due to their strengths. Getting PSR, we expected puberty exactly who involved with PSR to statement more hierarchical than just egalitarian dating, however, into the the quantity that variation seemed, we questioned hierarchical PSR to be of this enjoy away from good celebrity’s skill and you can egalitarian PSR to get in the appearance. We as well as questioned PSR to be on the high engagement, strength, and you will investment for the parasocial affairs. As for gender differences, we requested deeper endorsement away from athletes among boys and you may performers one of girls, highest pricing regarding engagement, intensity, and you can PSR from inside the girls than just boys, as well as for boys to comprehend their celebrities due to their speciality way more tend to than girls. Lastly, i questioned girls to-be a lot more private regarding their parasocial situations than boys.

Members

The initial sample was 107 girls (M_age = , SD = 0.35) and 61 boys (M_age = , SD = 0.42) in ninth grade at a public high school in a US Northeastern suburb. However, seven girls (6.5%) and eight boys (13.1%) did not identify a celebrity of whom they were particularly fond, so the final sample included 100 girls (M_age = , SD = 0.35) and 53 boys (M_age = , SD = 0.38). This ratio reflects the gender ratios in much of the research neden KamboГ§ya kadД±nlar en iyi eЕџler on PSI (Cohen, 1999, 2003, 2004; Cole and Leets, 1999; Maltby et al., 2006; Derrick et al., 2008, 2009). Adolescents were 73% Caucasian, 12% Asian, 8% Biracial, 2% Latino, 2% African-American, and 1% Native-American (2% chose “Other” or did not respond), and approximately 75% had at least one parent who had graduated college. Participation (72.3%) was solicited through a letter and consent form sent to parents through the school. Participants received a $5 gift certificate for ice cream, and the school received a donation. This study was carried out with the approval of and in accordance with the recommendations of the Wellesley College Ethics Review Board with written informed consent from parents and assent from all participants in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Actions

A survey addressed areas of (PSI/PSR) along with identity away from celebs chose for parasocial attract and diversity and you will adaptation during the quasi-dating envisioned with these a-listers. I investigated whether superstar vocation otherwise relationships thought were linked to the advantages teens respected inside their selected stars, including psychological and you can behavioral signs away from PSI/PSR, for example participants’ number of wedding in the parasocial situations, the mental intensity of the experience, the hard work finding aside about their picked celebrities, and you will whether or not they common their attention during these news numbers which have friends and family. Players was in fact basic requested to understand an exact same-sex celebrity out-of just who they were like fond (“Really teenage girls/boys keeps popular celebrity otherwise a popular profile off Tv, movie, or pop music culture: and this Feminine/Male Star are you currently particularly attracted to?”). grams., Derrick mais aussi al., 2008).

Celebrity Kind of

Mass media numbers named was classified towards five celebrity sizes: step 1 = stars, 2 = athletes, step three = singers, cuatro = standard stars (age.grams., speak let you know machine Oprah), and you may 5 = publishers. Famous people that fit with the numerous categories (elizabeth.g., Oprah is additionally a celebrity) was indeed coded with regards to the category by which these people were most useful understood. One or two separate coders obtained all solutions; precision try higher (kappa = 0.92). Disagreements were fixed by the dialogue.